Typed tests
-Tests with tag evidence.
Overall Quality Score
92
Quality Index
▲ +5% vs last week
Test Coverage Overview
Unit Tests
94%
Integration
78%
E2E Tests
65%
Performance Metrics
Execution Time
2.3s
Success Rate
89.2%
Automation
76%
Test Statistics
1,247
Total Tests
1,112
Passed
135
Failed
🔺 Test Pyramid Analysis
E2E / UI Tests
24 tests
(15%)
Integration Tests
87 tests
(25%)
Unit Tests
245 tests
(60%)
🟢 Excellent Pyramid Health
🧪 Test Coverage by Type
Qualimetry measures coverage across test levels, quality attributes, user perspectives, UX evidence, validation methods, and automation modes.
Unit
Integration
API
E2E
Security
UX
Manual / Hybrid / Auto
Type breadth
-Waiting
Pass rate
-Latest execution health.
Traceability
-Criteria linked to code tests.
Executed tests
-Latest run evidence.
Manual checkpoints
-Manual or hybrid validation pressure.
Automation modes
Waiting for synchronized Qualimetry evidence.
Coverage gaps
- Waiting for synchronized Qualimetry evidence.
Strongest signals
- Waiting for synchronized Qualimetry evidence.
🗺️ Modern SDLC Loop Map
Interactive Qualimetry image for measuring the enterprise product loop: 6 phase leads, business, marketing, customer voice, competition, R&D, delivery, operations, support, heat-points, the 6 Amigos + FM + QM ritual, and BEASTY-ready zones.
Red: contingency
/ problems
Yellow:
medium
Green:
healthy
Fixed phase borders
CE. Elicit
Continuously elicit value, business vision, marketing, customer voice, competition, criteria, risks, standards, and definition of ready.
Phase Lead: Product / Business Lead Auto/AI: evaluatingCP. Plan
Backlog, epics, stories, slicing, capacity, dependencies, tools, starting data, and phase readiness.
Phase Lead: Planning Lead Auto/AI: evaluatingCI. Implement
Code, tests, scripts, agents, evidence, and executable criteria.
Phase Lead: Engineering Lead Auto/AI: evaluatingCD. Diffuse
CI/CD, gates, packaging, rollback, release, production readiness, and Delivery Manager coordination.
Phase Lead: Delivery Manager Auto/AI: evaluatingCC. Care
Care, support, real usage, incidents, satisfaction, and weak signals.
Phase Lead: Customer Care / Support Lead Auto/AI: evaluatingCM. Measure
ROI, coverage, customer confidence, competition, bottlenecks, and return to Elicit.
Phase Lead: Qualimetry Lead Auto/AI: evaluatingShift-Left
Tests become business rules, product rules, criteria, requirements, and specifications.
Shift-Right
Continuous feedback, full traceability, satisfaction, and measured return to Elicit.
Decision Qualimetry
Measures risk, evidence, accountable role, touched tool, customer voice, competition, and the next BEASTEST action.
Quality Manager
Transverse quality coach paired with the Flow Manager: coaches phase leads on quality, security, lean, sigma, standards, evidence, and toolbox discipline.
Flow Manager
Transverse agile/lean flow coach: connects every phase lead to the Measure-to-Elicit return loop.
Global governance
6 Amigos + FM + QM links the 3 Dev phase leads, 3 Ops phase leads, Flow Manager, and Quality Manager.
Priority heat-points
- Implement -> Diffuse: dev/ops handoff, CI/CD, gates, release evidence, and Delivery Manager readiness.
- Measure -> Elicit: customer voice, competition, marketing, and business vision.
- Plan -> Implement: epics, stories, slicing, unclear criteria, incomplete tools, or uncovered role ownership.
Tool inventory
- Global toolbox: marketing, discovery, backlog, specs, design, repository, security, CI/CD, tests, observability, support, documentation.
- Owner, real use, friction, available evidence, BEASTY integration, customer voice, and competition.
- Links to Integrity, Delivery, Sealidify, and BEASTY-TASK.
BEASTY readiness
- Observe: current task and sufficient data.
- Assist: checklist, recommendation, risk, and evidence.
- Execute: agent or task with guardrails, verification, and rollback.
6 phase leads + FM/QM
- No duplicated Flow Manager or Quality Manager per phase: each phase lead carries local quality and flow signals.
- Diffuse: the Delivery Manager leads release, gates, evidence, communication, rollback, and production readiness.
- 6 Amigos + FM + QM links 3 Dev phase leads, 3 Ops phase leads, Flow Manager, and Quality Manager.
Current
Measure roles, tools, manual tasks, irritants, and missing evidence without waiting for ideal maturity.
Next move
The right 6 Amigos voices meet with Flow Manager and Quality Manager to turn the most expensive heat-point into a Sealidify or BEASTY-TASK action.
Continuous ideal
Agile + quality = excellence: every department evolves under Flow + Quality, every handoff creates evidence, and every loop learns with BEASTEST.
📐 Standards / Rules / Success Criteria
Quality standards, rules, success criteria, modeling assets, and statistical thresholds linked into one measurable decision contract.
Standards
Rules
Success criteria
Stat thresholds
Linked standards
4Quality model, release rulebook, statistical control, modeling discipline.
Rule families
12Product, process, code, data, UX, security, performance, release.
Model score
-Waiting
Threshold breaches
-Red or yellow statistical bounds needing review.
Linking chain
Quality standard
Rule
Success criterion
Model element
Stat threshold
Decision / action
| Standard | Rule | Success criterion | Model link | Threshold | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Model | Critical criteria are traced to executable evidence. | Every critical flow has a criterion, owner, test, and result. | Requirement -> Criterion -> Test -> Result | >= 85% traceability | Watch |
| Release Rulebook | Release gates block when success criteria are red. | No critical fail, no unresolved skip, rollback evidence present. | Gate -> Evidence -> Approval -> Rollback | >= 95% pass rate | Gap |
| Statistical Control | A quality signal becomes actionable only when its threshold is explicit. | Pass rate, defect density, duration, drift, and confidence have green/yellow/red bounds. | Metric -> Threshold -> Decision -> Action | 3-color bounds | Ready |
| Modeling Discipline | Models, rules, criteria, and tests stay linked through one evidence chain. | Business model, process model, data model, UX model, and test model expose the same success contract. | Business -> Process -> Data -> UX -> Test | >= 85% model alignment | Watch |
Live statistical thresholds
| Metric | Target | Live | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass rate | >= 95% | - | Waiting |
| Traceability | >= 85% | - | Waiting |
| Defect density | <= 0.05 | - | Waiting |
| Cycle time | <= 3s | - | Waiting |
| Automation evidence | >= 80% | - | Waiting |
| Model alignment | >= 85% | - | Waiting |
Modeling assets
- Business rules mapped to measurable criteria.
- Process and data models linked to validation evidence.
- UX and customer models connected to satisfaction thresholds.
- Test model connected to execution, traceability, and release gates.
Current threshold review
- Waiting for synchronized Qualimetry metrics.
🛡️ Auto+AI Readiness Gate
Evidence-first control surface that decides the highest safe automation mode from Qualimetry metrics, approval, rollback, and audit readiness.
Evidence first
Human approval
Rollback
BEASTY-TASK
Decision
WaitingWaiting
Allowed mode
Assist onlyWaiting for Qualimetry evidence.
Blockers
-Red controls prevent Auto+AI execution.
Confidence
-Weighted from quality, traceability, automation, and evidence.
Gate chain
Qualimetry signal
Standard / rule
Evidence bundle
Approval
Rollback
Allowed mode
Assist only
BEASTY can explain, classify, and recommend without changing the product.
WaitingSuggest + simulate
Suggestions can be simulated against standards, rules, evidence, and rollback expectations.
WaitingSemi-auto
A human launches the action and keeps control while automated segments produce evidence.
WaitingHybrid
Automation can run with required manual checkpoints and auditable approvals.
WaitingAuto gated
Automation is technically ready but still waits for explicit approval or rollback evidence.
WaitingAuto allowed
Auto+AI can execute inside guardrails because quality, evidence, approval, and rollback are green.
Waiting| Phase | Positive impact | Negative impact | Guardrail | Gate state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE Elicit | Customer voice, competition, criteria, and risks are synthesized faster. | Misread need, market bias, or invented criterion if the source is weak. | Source, business owner, criterion trace, and 6 Amigos validation. | Waiting
Waiting for gate evidence. |
| CP Plan | Slicing, dependencies, capacity, and planning scenarios accelerate. | Overconfident estimate, hidden dependency, or misranked priority. | Simulation, explicit constraints, PO/Flow Manager approval. | Waiting
Waiting for gate evidence. |
| CI Implement | Tests, scripts, refactoring, and executable evidence are produced faster. | Unsafe code, hidden debt, brittle tests, or false coverage confidence. | Standards, review, pass rate, defect density, and traceability. | Waiting
Waiting for gate evidence. |
| CD Diffuse | Release checklist, packaging, gates, and rollback become repeatable. | Autonomous release without rollback evidence or clear approval. | Delivery Manager, rollback present, approval present, auto gated only. | Waiting
Waiting for gate evidence. |
| CC Care | Support triage, incident summaries, weak signals, and satisfaction become clearer. | Wrong customer response, lost context, privacy risk, or missed escalation. | Human in the loop for customer impact and explicit escalation. | Waiting
Waiting for gate evidence. |
| CM Measure | ROI, quality, adoption, and next BEASTY-TASK actions emerge from the loop. | Optimizing the wrong metric or creating a biased feedback loop. | Qualimetry, Quality Manager, Flow Manager, and Measure -> Elicit return. | Waiting
Waiting for gate evidence. |
| Control | Target | Live | Source | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pass rate | >= 95% | - | Last execution result | Waiting |
| Traceability | >= 85% | - | Criterion -> test -> result | Waiting |
| Defect density | <= 0.05 | - | Fail pressure per criterion | Waiting |
| Automation evidence | >= 80% | - | Automated vs manual events | Waiting |
| Model alignment | >= 85% | - | Quality + traceability + shift-left | Waiting |
| Manual checkpoints | 0 open | - | Manual/hybrid evidence | Waiting |
| Rollback evidence | present | - | Delivery contract | Waiting |
| Approval control | present | - | Human accountability | Waiting |
Current blockers
- Waiting for Qualimetry evidence.
Next BEASTY-TASK
- Sync execution evidence, then BEASTY can turn the highest blocker into an improvement task.
Audit contract
- Every Auto+AI decision keeps a reason, source metric, owner, approval, and rollback expectation.
- A red control degrades execution to assist/simulate until the evidence is repaired.
🎯 Agile Testing Quadrants (ATQ) Matrix
Professional analysis based on Brian Marick's Testing Quadrants methodology
Q1
Technology Facing
Technology Facing
Supporting Development
Unit Tests: 94%
Component Tests: 89%
🤖 Fully Automated
Q2
Business Facing
Business Facing
Supporting Development
Story Tests: 76%
Functional Tests: 82%
🔧 Semi-Automated
Q3
Business Facing
Business Facing
Critiquing Product
Exploratory Tests: 68%
User Acceptance: 71%
👤 Manual
Q4
Technology Facing
Technology Facing
Critiquing Product
Performance Tests: 85%
Security Tests: 79%
🔬 Tool-Assisted
Detailed Coverage Analysis
| Feature/Module | Q1 (Unit) | Q2 (Functional) | Q3 (Exploratory) | Q4 (Non-Functional) | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authentication Module | 94% | 76% | 68% | 85% | 81% |
| User Management | 91% | 82% | 71% | 79% | 81% |
| Payment Processing | 89% | 74% | 45% | 88% | 74% |
| Data Analytics | 96% | 78% | 62% | 72% | 77% |
🔥 Quality Heatmaps - Interactive Analysis
📋 Models Coverage Heatmap
High Coverage (80-100%)
Medium Coverage (50-79%)
Low Coverage (0-49%)
⚠️ Modules Failure Analysis
Critical (>10 failures)
Moderate (5-10 failures)
Low (1-4 failures)
No Failures
⏰ 24h Test Execution Timeline
🚦 Execution Profiles Timeline (Criteria vs Code)
💰 ROI Analytics - Return on Investment Analysis
Testing ROI
325%
Return on Quality Investment
▲ +12% this quarter
Defect Prevention
€124K
Costs avoided through testing
▲ +8% this month
Time Savings
67%
Automation vs Manual
▲ +15% efficiency
Quality Index
92
Overall Quality Score
▲ +5 points
Shift-Left Index
78%
Early lifecycle validation rate
▲ +6% this month
Criteria-Code Traceability
0%
Linked criteria to code tests
➡ baseline
📊 Cost Breakdown Analysis
📈 Benefits Timeline
💡 ROI Optimization Recommendations
📊 Advanced Statistics & Analytics
89.2%
Pass Rate
+2.3%
2.3s
Avg Execution Time
+0.1s
1.2
Defects/KLOC
-0.3
3.2
Tests/Day
+0.5
📊 Test Results Distribution
📉 Failure Rate Trends (7 days)
📋 Detailed Statistics by Section
| Section | Total Tests | Pass Rate | Avg Duration | Coverage | Defect Density |
|---|
🏷️ Typologie des tests (manuel/hybride/full auto + catégories)
Chargement de la typologie...
🧪 TDD Feature Registry — État de réalisation BEASTEST
💚 Implémenté & testé | ⭕ Planifié (TDD RED) — Dans le Test Explorer VS Code : ✅ passe = 💚 / ❌ échoue = ⭕
Chargement du registre TDD...
🔗 Cross-Section Quality Integration
DELIVERY (CD)
🟢 ConnectedRelease Readiness: 94%
Deployment Risk: Low
Last sync: 2 min ago
INTEGRITY (CI)
🟢 ConnectedModel Coverage: 87%
Module Binding: 92%
Criteria→Code Coverage: 0%
Last sync: 1 min ago
LABORATORY
🟢 ConnectedTest Execution: 89%
Automation Rate: 76%
Last sync: 30 sec ago
IDENTITY
🟢 ConnectedTraceability: 91%
Compliance: 88%
Last sync: 1 min ago
SEA (CAI)
🟢 ConnectedAI Quality Score: 85%
Automation Level: 79%
Last sync: 45 sec ago
⚡ Real-time Synchronization Status
Auto-refresh: 30s interval
Cross-section data: Real-time
Quality metrics: Live updates
🎯 Top Unlinked Criteria vs Code Tests (0)
| Criterion | Priorité | Tags | Code Suggestions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for criteria↔code traceability data... | |||
📋 Executive Reports & Analytics
Executive Dashboard
Comprehensive overview for management with KPIs and trends
Quality Deep Dive
Detailed technical analysis with recommendations
ROI Analysis Report
Financial impact and return on testing investment
Trend Analysis
Historical trends and predictive analytics
📄 Recent Reports
Q4 Quality Report
Generated: Dec 15, 2024
Monthly ROI Analysis
Generated: Dec 12, 2024
Coverage Deep Dive
Generated: Dec 10, 2024